Insights From 55.8M AI Overviews Across 590M Searches—A Study by Ahrefs

Portrait of Patrick Stox

By Patrick Stox

Technical SEO at Ahrefs

Reviewed by
May 19, 202527 min read
301 Linking websitesArticle performance data from Ahrefs
Contents
According to Google, AI Overviews (AIOs) had over 1.5 billion users a month in Q1 2025. That would be 18.3% of all the people on the planet or 26.6% of all internet users. That's a massive reach.

In traditional Ahrefs fashion, I wanted to do the largest data study ever done on AIOs to see what we could learn and share with the marketing community. For a twist on most studies, I’ve shown how they compare to search queries overall.

As a bonus, I’ll show you how you can pull the numbers yourself any time you want updated data.

Let’s dig into the data.

Contents

Key takeaways

Here’s a quick look at some of the biggest takeaways:

  • AIOs show for 9.46% of all keywords on Desktop, 16% in the US
  • AIOs show for 12.8% or more of all Google searches by volume
  • The top 50 domains have 28.90% of all mentions
  • AIOs show more than normal for informational queries, longer search queries, and queries with higher search volumes
  • AIOs show up less than normal for branded queries, local queries, and shorter search queries
  • AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

AIOs are showing more than ever. They’re reducing clicks by 34.5%. And yet, most of the queries they’re showing for are informational queries that people weren’t bidding on.

At the very least, AIOs aren’t likely to impact Google’s bottom line. I wonder how much they will impact companies? Companies investing in their content are also the most likely to show for AIOs. Some may even benefit from them, but the vast majority, I think, will lose traffic. We’ll have to see how it plays out.

AI Overviews are showing more than ever

You can do a blank search in Brand Radar to see how many AIOs we’ve seen for the SERPs Ahrefs uses to build our traffic estimates. The line chart shows the trend over time, including the huge increase in their presence in March 2025.

AIOs show for 9.46% of all keywords, but they haven’t fully rolled out

At the time of writing, we have ~55.8 million AIOs from Desktop search results. This is out of 590M total keywords used to build our organic search traffic index, ~9.46% of the total. You can refer to our Big Data page at any time to get the current number of keywords in our index and the number for each country.

AIOs show for 12.8% or more of all searches by volume

You can switch the tab to Impressions to see the total search volume for all the terms showing AIOs, or their total visibility. As of June 15th, 2025, it’s ~23 billion total volume out of ~180 billion total monthly searches in our index. 12.8% of all Google searches are showing AIOs.

Sidenote


Our data undercounts the total number of search terms and impressions for AIOs. We don’t pull SERPs for one-off or low volume queries to build our traffic index, but AIOs do show on many of these queries. We also pull AIO data from logged-out users, when they’re more likely to show to logged-in users. Many countries still don’t show them to logged-out users yet. It wouldn’t surprise me if AIOs are showing for more than 75% of all Google searches by volume.

Ahrefs and Google by the numbers

Because I don’t want anyone directly comparing our numbers to Google’s number where they say there are over 5 trillion searches annually, I feel like I need to quickly explain some differences.

Some quick math on our numbers. 180 million monthly searches * 12 months = 2.16 trillion searches a year in our data. That’s less than the 5 trillion Google says.

To try to explain the difference, there are many low-volume searches that Google classifies as anonymous queries. According to Google, 15% of searches have never been searched before. When we looked at GSC data a few years ago, 46.08% of queries were anonymous.

2.16 trillion (our yearly search numbers) / 0.54 (non-anonymous query %) = 4 trillion searches. That’s in the ballpark. Any further differences could be because anonymous queries increased, we have some gaps in our keyword database, or our volume estimates are a bit low.

Sidenote


I do suspect the number of anonymous queries has increased and will increase further. People’s search behaviour has changed and they’re searching with much longer queries than they used to.

Google no longer has a max word count when searching. It used to be 32 words max, but now you can have as many as you want until the max URL limit is reached.

 

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

 

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

 

AIOs show up more than normal for queries with higher search volume

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Search Volume. This one shocked me. I was expecting AIOs to be over-represented in lower volume queries.

I see AIOs often when I’m searching long-tail queries, especially ones that I think are pretty unique queries. This wasn’t reflected in the data, however it may be biased as we don’t include many of the queries like I described in our search traffic index.

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

 

AIOs by KD

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Keyword Difficulty (KD). It looks like AIOs are most likely to show on lower KD terms, but that’s pretty normal in the dataset.

AIOs show up more than normal for queries with higher search volume

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Search Volume. This one shocked me. I was expecting AIOs to be over-represented in lower volume queries.

I see AIOs often when I’m searching long-tail queries, especially ones that I think are pretty unique queries. This wasn’t reflected in the data, however it may be biased as we don’t include many of the queries like I described in our search traffic index.

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

 

AIOs show more than normal for non-branded terms

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP + Branded or Non-Branded intents. At the time of writing I got the following percentages:

  • Branded: 19.97%
  • Non-branded: 80.03%

AIOs are less likely to show up for branded searches.

AIOs show up less than normal for local queries

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP and Local or Non-Local intents. At the time of writing, I got the following percentages:

  • Local: 6.85%
  • Non-Local: 93.15%

AIOs are less likely to show up for local searches.

AIOs show up less in shorter search queries and more in longer search queries

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by word count tells an interesting story. AIOs have a greater representation when looking at longer search queries.

AIOs by KD

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Keyword Difficulty (KD). It looks like AIOs are most likely to show on lower KD terms, but that’s pretty normal in the dataset.

AIOs show up more than normal for queries with higher search volume

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Search Volume. This one shocked me. I was expecting AIOs to be over-represented in lower volume queries.

I see AIOs often when I’m searching long-tail queries, especially ones that I think are pretty unique queries. This wasn’t reflected in the data, however it may be biased as we don’t include many of the queries like I described in our search traffic index.

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

 

AIOs show more than normal for informational queries

In Keywords Explorer, you can do a blank search and get all the data for a country. If you filter by “SERP features” to “On SERP” > “AI Overview”, then you can see the total number of AIOs in our data. 24.8M for the US at the time of writing.

You can further filter by different data points like Intent to see more information about the type of terms where AIOs are showing.

For example, for the above search I got 24.3M keywords for Informational intent out of 24.8M total for the US. That’s 97.70% of the total.

Remember that searches can have more than 1 intent. Here’s a breakdown with the current numbers:

  • Informational: 97.70%
  • Navigational: 1.23%
  • Commercial: 12.86%
  • Transactional: 2.85%

AIOs show more than normal for non-branded terms

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP + Branded or Non-Branded intents. At the time of writing I got the following percentages:

  • Branded: 19.97%
  • Non-branded: 80.03%

AIOs are less likely to show up for branded searches.

AIOs show up less than normal for local queries

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP and Local or Non-Local intents. At the time of writing, I got the following percentages:

  • Local: 6.85%
  • Non-Local: 93.15%

AIOs are less likely to show up for local searches.

AIOs show up less in shorter search queries and more in longer search queries

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by word count tells an interesting story. AIOs have a greater representation when looking at longer search queries.

AIOs by KD

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Keyword Difficulty (KD). It looks like AIOs are most likely to show on lower KD terms, but that’s pretty normal in the dataset.

AIOs show up more than normal for queries with higher search volume

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Search Volume. This one shocked me. I was expecting AIOs to be over-represented in lower volume queries.

I see AIOs often when I’m searching long-tail queries, especially ones that I think are pretty unique queries. This wasn’t reflected in the data, however it may be biased as we don’t include many of the queries like I described in our search traffic index.

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

AIOs show for ~12.5–16.5% of searches in countries where they rolled out

AIOs had a staggered rollout. You can see country-level data by changing the country in the dropdown in Brand Radar.

AIOs show for 16% of all US keywords on Desktop

AIOs show for ~24.9 million out of 156 million search terms in our US organic search traffic index, ~16% of the total searches.

You can easily calculate this number for each country with the mentions data above and divide that by the total number of the Big Data page. India 16.5%, Brazil 15.5%, UK 12.5%, etc.

Sidenote


If you see many countries without AIOs, it’s because they don’t have AIOs yet or don’t have them for logged-out users.

Websites showing the most in AIOs include Wikipedia, Reddit, & Quora

You can use the domains tab in Brand Radar to see what domains are mentioned in AIOs over time. We’ll have a filter for this shortly, but right now you can see the domains that have the greatest share of AIOs.

The top 50 domains have 28.9% of all AIO mentions

AIOs are dominated by top sites. While many people report losing clicks to AIOs, I wouldn’t be surprised if many of these sites were actually benefiting from them.

Domain
Mentions
Impressions
reddit.com
2,971,746
1,881,884,930
en.wikipedia.org
2,920,525
13,910,509,832
quora.com
2,276,494
618,988,629
youtube.com
2,063,355
3,577,707,498
nih.gov
1,288,730
3,124,783,852
mayoclinic.org
1,316,872
6,159,726,120
clevelandclinic.org
1,109,623
5,098,852,777
translate.google.com
857,892
4,465,811,843
healthline.com
979,908
2,236,792,358
webmd.com
917,464
2,190,526,123
apple.com
441,986
680,920,972
es.wikipedia.org
597,865
5,223,350,730
microsoft.com
464,330
986,660,551
medicalnewstoday.com
573,680
1,188,183,953
www.nhs.uk
493,760
2,507,074,568
medlineplus.gov
473,850
2,721,231,563
facebook.com
438,867
446,833,096
instagram.com
441,136
746,231,176
indeed.com
359,963
553,924,993
support.google.com
297,335
522,568,488
brainly.com
264,347
23,764,810
britannica.com
297,924
2,497,564,834
testbook.com
229,035
84,720,146
amazon.com
238,838
523,926,930
alodokter.com
199,193
278,035,342
merriam-webster.com
256,994
3,170,311,903
study.com
248,252
558,343,910
msdmanuals.com
242,777
651,464,581
sciencedirect.com
242,799
662,899,861
uol.com.br
199,395
284,636,935
kumparan.com
184,165
116,489,768
justanswer.com
183,094
17,821,281
byjus.com
196,500
377,110,507
cambridge.org
192,555
3,041,651,028
verywellhealth.com
195,389
167,090,643
detik.com
166,645
127,771,207
indiatimes.com
161,599
264,059,019
investopedia.com
161,975
660,434,615
pt.wikipedia.org
163,875
1,069,981,476
kidshealth.org
161,776
441,933,241
fandom.com
145,761
519,074,759
wiktionary.org
159,394
820,932,071
tuasaude.com
146,483
175,433,902
imdb.com
138,758
345,263,254
stackexchange.com
140,760
45,714,814
rae.es
127,392
1,166,423,287
cdc.gov
130,112
621,061,238
linkedin.com
130,896
308,787,699
hopkinsmedicine.org
136,577
645,290,307
petmd.com
129,065
108,308,035

For those 50 sites, here are the categories and their percentage of overall mentions:

  • Knowledge & Reference – 4.4%
  • Health & Medical – 5.8%
  • Q&A & Community Discussion – 5.9%
  • Video & Social Media – 3.4%
  • Search & Translation Tools – 1.2%
  • Education & Learning – 1.3%
  • News & Media – 0.6%
  • E-Commerce & Tech – 1.1%
  • Job & Career – 0.4%
  • Regional & Localized Health – 0.4%

You can filter the dataset to be more specific to your industry. Check the domain tabs to see how competing sites are performing. For example, here I’ve filtered to look for keywords or AI Overviews containing “website builder”.

Another way of doing this is to use the full dataset, but use the “Find mentions of brands, products, or services” filter. Enter 1 or 2 and use “Suggest more” to use AI to get some of the competing companies or products.

The share and reach reports will give you Share of Voice (SoV) for mentions and impressions.

AIOs show more than normal for informational queries

In Keywords Explorer, you can do a blank search and get all the data for a country. If you filter by “SERP features” to “On SERP” > “AI Overview”, then you can see the total number of AIOs in our data. 24.8M for the US at the time of writing.

You can further filter by different data points like Intent to see more information about the type of terms where AIOs are showing.

For example, for the above search I got 24.3M keywords for Informational intent out of 24.8M total for the US. That’s 97.70% of the total.

Remember that searches can have more than 1 intent. Here’s a breakdown with the current numbers:

  • Informational: 97.70%
  • Navigational: 1.23%
  • Commercial: 12.86%
  • Transactional: 2.85%

AIOs show more than normal for non-branded terms

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP + Branded or Non-Branded intents. At the time of writing I got the following percentages:

  • Branded: 19.97%
  • Non-branded: 80.03%

AIOs are less likely to show up for branded searches.

AIOs show up less than normal for local queries

You can filter Keywords Explorer as described above to AIOs on the SERP and Local or Non-Local intents. At the time of writing, I got the following percentages:

  • Local: 6.85%
  • Non-Local: 93.15%

AIOs are less likely to show up for local searches.

AIOs show up less in shorter search queries and more in longer search queries

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by word count tells an interesting story. AIOs have a greater representation when looking at longer search queries.

AIOs by KD

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Keyword Difficulty (KD). It looks like AIOs are most likely to show on lower KD terms, but that’s pretty normal in the dataset.

AIOs show up more than normal for queries with higher search volume

I filtered Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtered by Search Volume. This one shocked me. I was expecting AIOs to be over-represented in lower volume queries.

I see AIOs often when I’m searching long-tail queries, especially ones that I think are pretty unique queries. This wasn’t reflected in the data, however it may be biased as we don’t include many of the queries like I described in our search traffic index.

AIOs mostly show on non-monetized searches

Filtering Keywords Explorer to SERPs with AIOs and filtering by Cost-Per-Click (CPC), or the cost of an ad click, shows a slight bias for lower CPC terms.

What’s more interesting is that 71.67% of the searches with AIOs had no CPC data. This indicates a majority of the AIO searches weren’t monetized at all. It’s no wonder no one has seen ads in AIOs yet. They aren’t showing for the majority of the terms that make Google money.

Want to see why some brands get mentioned more?

One of the unique things about Ahrefs Brand Radar is that we also have web pages as a data source. With this, you can see which brands are mentioned the most online and which have the most visibility. This can help you explain why a competitor might show up more than you do for AIOs or other LLMs.

LLMs work as next word predictors with a bit of variability built in. If you’re mentioned more in the training data such as web pages, you’re going to be mentioned more in the outputs of LLMs.

Final thoughts

Don’t wait for the next big study if you need to report what is happening with AIOs. You can run the data yourself with Ahrefs at any time with Brand Radar and Keywords Explorer.

If you have questions, message me on X or LinkedIn.

 

Portrait of Patrick Stox

Patrick Stox is a Product Advisor, Technical SEO, & Brand Ambassador at Ahrefs. He was the lead author for the SEO chapter of the 2021 Web Almanac and a reviewer for the 2022 SEO chapter. He also co-wrote the SEO Book For Beginners by Ahrefs and was the Technical Review Editor for The Art of SEO 4th Edition. He’s an organizer for the Triangle SEO Meetup, the Tech SEO Connect conference, he runs a Technical SEO Slack group, and is a moderator for /r/TechSEO on Reddit.

Reviewed by

Your weekly marketing’s must-reads

Join 284K marketers for weekly news, useful reads, industry updates, and the memes you didn’t know you needed.

Explore what’s inside the newsletter →