Here’s a Google search operator you may be familiar with.
It’s easy to remember most search operators. They’re short commands that stick in the mind.
But knowing how to use them effectively is an altogether different story.
Most SEOs know the basics, but few have truly mastered them.
In this post, I’ll share 15 actionable tips to help you master search operators for SEO, which are:
- Find indexation errors
- Find non-secure pages (non-https)
- Find duplicate content issues
- Find unwanted files and pages on your site
- Find guest post opportunities
- Find resource page opportunities
- Find sites that feature infographics… so you can pitch YOURS
- Find more link prospects… AND check how relevant they are
- Find social profiles for outreach prospects
- Find internal linking opportunities
- Find PR opportunities by finding competitor mentions
- Find sponsored post opportunities
- Find Q+A threads related to your content
- Find how often your competitors are publishing new content
- Find sites linking to competitors
But first, here’s a complete list of all Google search operators and their functionality.
Google Search Operators: The Complete List
Did you know that Google is constantly killing useful operators?
That’s why most existing lists of Google search operators are outdated and inaccurate.
For this post, I personally tested EVERY search operator I could find.
Here is a complete list of all working, non-working, and “hit and miss” Google advanced search operators as of 2018.
Force an exact-match search. Use this to refine results for ambiguous searches, or to exclude synonyms when searching for single words.
Example: “steve jobs”
Search for X or Y. This will return results related to X or Y, or both. Note: The pipe (|) operator can also be used in place of “OR.”
Search for X and Y. This will return only results related to both X and Y. Note: It doesn’t really make much difference for regular searches, as Google defaults to “AND” anyway. But it’s very useful when paired with other operators.
Example: jobs AND gates
Exclude a term or phrase. In our example, any pages returned will be related to jobs but not Apple (the company).
Example: jobs ‑apple
Acts as a wildcard and will match any word or phrase.
Example: steve * apple
Group multiple terms or search operators to control how the search is executed.
Example: (ipad OR iphone) apple
Search for prices. Also works for Euro (€), but not GBP (£) 🙁
Example: ipad $329
A dictionary built into Google, basically. This will display the meaning of a word in a card-like result in the SERPs.
Returns the most recent cached version of a web page (providing the page is indexed, of course).
Restrict results to those of a certain filetype. E.g., PDF, DOCX, TXT, PPT, etc. Note: The “ext:” operator can also be used—the results are identical.
Limit results to those from a specific website.
Find sites related to a given domain.
Find pages with a certain word (or words) in the title. In our example, any results containing the word “apple” in the title tag will be returned.
Similar to “intitle,” but only results containing all of the specified words in the title tag will be returned.
Example: allintitle:apple iphone
Find pages with a certain word (or words) in the URL. For this example, any results containing the word “apple” in the URL will be returned.
Similar to “inurl,” but only results containing all of the specified words in the URL will be returned.
Example: allinurl:apple iphone
Find pages containing a certain word (or words) somewhere in the content. For this example, any results containing the word “apple” in the page content will be returned.
Similar to “intext,” but only results containing all of the specified words somewhere on the page will be returned.
Example: allintext:apple iphone
Proximity search. Find pages containing two words or phrases within X words of each other. For this example, the words “apple” and “iphone” must be present in the content and no further than four words apart.
Example: apple AROUND(4) iphone
Find the weather for a specific location. This is displayed in a weather snippet, but it also returns results from other “weather” websites.
Example: weather:san francisco
See stock information (i.e., price, etc.) for a specific ticker.
Force Google to show map results for a locational search.
Example: map:silicon valley
Find information about a specific movie. Also finds movie showtimes if the movie is currently showing near you.
Example: movie:steve jobs
Convert one unit to another. Works with currencies, weights, temperatures, etc.
Example: $329 in GBP
Find news results from a certain source in Google News.
Example: apple source:the_verge
Not exactly a search operator, but acts as a wildcard for Google Autocomplete.
Example: apple CEO _ jobs
Here are the ones that are hit and miss, according to my testing:
Search for a range of numbers. In the example below, searches related to “WWDC videos” are returned for the years 2010–2014, but not for 2015 and beyond.
Example: wwdc video 2010..2014
Find pages that are being linked to with specific anchor text. For this example, any results with inbound links containing either “apple” or “iphone” in the anchor text will be returned.
Example: inanchor:apple iphone
Similar to “inanchor,” but only results containing all of the specified words in the inbound anchor text will be returned.
Example: allinanchor:apple iphone
Find blog URLs under a specific domain. This was used in Google blog search, but I’ve found it does return some results in regular search.
Find results from a given area.
Example: loc:”san francisco” apple
Find news from a certain location in Google News.
Example: loc:”san francisco” apple
Here are the Google search operators that have been discontinued and no longer work. 🙁
Force an exact-match search on a single word or phrase.
Example: jobs +apple
Include synonyms. Doesn’t work, because Google now includes synonyms by default. (Hint: Use double quotes to exclude synonyms.)
Find blog posts written by a specific author. This only worked in Google Blog search, not regular Google search.
Example: inpostauthor:”steve jobs”
Similar to “inpostauthor,” but removes the need for quotes (if you want to search for a specific author, including surname.)
Example: allinpostauthor:steve jobs
Find blog posts with specific words in the title. No longer works, as this operator was unique to the discontinued Google blog search.
Example: intitle:apple iphone
Find pages linking to a specific domain or URL. Google killed this operator in 2017, but it does still show some results—they likely aren’t particularly accurate though. (Deprecated in 2017)
Find information about a specific page, including the most recent cache, similar pages, etc. (Deprecated in 2017). Note: The
id: operator can also be used—the results are identical.
Find results from a certain date range. Uses the Julian date format, for some reason.
Find someone’s phone number. (Deprecated in 2010)
Example: phonebook:tim cook
Searches #hashtags. Introduced for Google+; now deprecated.
15 Actionable Ways to Use Google Search Operators
Now let’s tackle a few ways to put these operators into action.
My aim here is to show that you can achieve almost anything with Google advanced operators if you know how to use and combine them efficiently.
So don’t be afraid to play around and deviate from the examples below. You might just discover something new.
Google indexation errors exist for most sites.
It could be that a page that should be indexed, isn’t. Or vice-versa.
Let’s use the
site: operator to see how many pages Google has indexed for ahrefs.com.
But how many of these pages are blog posts?
Let’s find out.
~249. That’s roughly ¼.
I know Ahrefs blog inside out, so I know this is higher than the number of posts we have.
Let’s investigate further.
OK, so it seems that a few odd pages are being indexed.
(This page isn’t even live—it’s a 404)
Such pages should be removed from the SERPs by noindexing them.
Let’s also narrow the search to subdomains and see what we find.
Here’s a page residing on a subdomain that definitely shouldn’t be indexed. It gives a 404 error for a start.
Here are a few other ways to uncover indexation errors with Google operators:
site:yourblog.com/category— find WordPress blog category pages;
site:yourblog.com inurl:tag— find WordPress “tag” pages.
HTTPs is a must these days, especially for ecommerce sites.
But did you know that you can find unsecure pages with the
Let’s try it for asos.com.
Oh my, ~2.47M unsecure pages.
It looks like ASAS don’t currently use SSL—unbelievable for such a large site.
But here’s another crazy thing:
ASOS is accessible at both the https and http versions.
And we learned all that from a simple
Duplicate content = bad.
Here’s a pair of Abercrombie and Fitch jeans from ASOS with this brand description:
With third-party brand descriptions like this, they’re often duplicated on other sites.
But first, I’m wondering how many times this copy appears on asos.com.
Now I’m wondering if this copy is even unique to ASOS.
No, it isn’t.
That’s 15 other sites with this exact same copy—i.e., duplicate content.
Sometimes duplicate content issues can arise from similar product pages, too.
For example, similar or identical products with different quantity counts.
Here’s an example from ASOS:
You can see that—quantities aside—all of these product pages are the same.
But duplicate content isn’t only a problem for ecommerce sites.
If you have a blog, then people could be stealing and republishing your content without attribution.
Let’s see if anyone has stolen and republished our list of SEO tips.
Most of these are probably syndicated content.
Still, it’s worth checking these out to make sure that they do link back to you.
Content Explorer > In title > enter the title of your page/post > exclude your own site
You will then see any pages (from our database of 900M+ pieces of content) with the same title as your page/post.
In this instance, there are 5 results.
Next, enter your domain under “Highlight unlinked domains.”
This will highlight any sites that don’t link back to you.
You can then reach out to those sites and request the addition of a source link.
FYI, this filter actually looks for links on a domain-level rather than a page-level. It is, therefore, possible that the site could be linking to you from another page, rather than the page in question.
Keeping track of everything on your website can be difficult.
(This is especially true for big sites.)
For this reason, it’s easy to forget about old files you may have uploaded.
PDF files; Word documents; Powerpoint presentations; text files; etc.
Let’s use the
filetype: operator to check for these on ahrefs.com.
ext:operator—it does the same thing.
Here’s one of those files:
I’ve never seen that piece of content before. Have you?
But we can extend this further than just PDF files.
By combining a few operators, it’s possible to return results for all supported file types at once.
It’s important to delete or noindex these if you’d prefer people didn’t come across them.
Guest post opportunities… there are TONS of ways to find them, such as:
But you already knew about that method, right!? 😉
So let’s get more creative.
First off: don’t limit yourself to “write for us.”
You can also use:
“become a contributor"
“write for me”(yep—there are solo bloggers seeking guest posts, too!)
“guest post guidelines”
But here’s a cool tip most people miss:
You can search for many of these at once.
You can even search for multiple footprints AND multiple keywords.
Looking for opportunities in a specific country?
Just add a
Here’s another method:
If you know of a serial guest blogger in your niche, try this:
This will find every site that person has written for.
Content Explorer > author search > exclude their site(s)
For this example, let’s use our very own Tim Soulo.
BOOM. 17 results. All of which are probably guest posts.
For reference, here’s the exact search I entered into Content Explorer:
author:”tim soulo” -site:ahrefs.com -site:bloggerjet.com
Basically, this searches for posts by Tim Soulo. But it also excludes posts from ahrefs.com and bloggerjet.com (Tim’s personal blog).
Note. Sometimes you will find a few false positives in there. It depends on how common the persons name happens to be.
But don’t stop there:
You can also use Content Explorer to find sites in your niche that have never linked to you.
Content Explorer > enter a topic > one article per domain > highlight unlinked domains
Here’s one of the unlinked domains I found for ahrefs.com:
This means marketingprofs.com has never linked to us.
Now, this search doesn’t tell us whether or not they have a “write for us” page. But it doesn’t really matter. The truth is that most sites are usually happy to accept guest posts if you can offer them “quality” content. It would, therefore, definitely be worth reaching out and “pitching” such sites.
Another benefit of using Content Explorer is that you can see stats for each page, including:
- # of RDs;
- Organic traffic estimation;
- Social shares;
You can also export the results easily. 🙂
Finally, if you’re wondering whether a specific site accepts guest posts or not, try this:
“Resource” pages round-up the best resources on a topic.
Here’s what a so-called “resource” page looks like:
All of those links you see = links to resources on other sites.
(Ironically—given the subject nature of that particular page—a lot of those links are broken)
So if you have a cool resource on your site, you can:
- find relevant “resource” pages;
- pitch your resource for inclusion
Here’s one way to find them:
But that can return a lot of junk.
Here’s a cool way to narrow it down:
Or narrow it down even further with:
allintitle:here ensures that the title tag contains the words “fitness” AND “resources,” and also a number between 5–15.
I know what you’re thinking:
Why not use the
#..# operator instead of that long sequence of numbers.
Let’s try it:
Confused? Here’s the deal:
This operator doesn’t play nicely with most other operators.
Nor does it seem to work a lot of the time anyway—it’s definitely hit and miss.
So I recommend using a sequence of numbers separated by “OR” or the pipe (“|”) operator.
It’s a bit of a hassle, but it works.
Infographics get a bad rap.
Most likely, this is because a lot of people create low-quality, cheap infographics that serve no real purpose… other than to “attract links.”
But infographics aren’t always bad.
Here’s the general strategy for infographics:
- create infographic
- pitch infographic
- get featured, get link (and PR!)
But who should you pitch your infographic to?
Just any old sites in your niche?
You should pitch to sites that are actually likely to want to feature your infographic.
The best way to do this is to find sites that have featured infographics before.
But again, this can kick back some serious junk.
So here’s a quick trick:
- use the above search to find a good, relevant infographic (i.e., well-designed, etc.)
- search for that specific infographic
Here’s an example:
This found ~2 results from the last 3 months. And 450+ all-time results.
Do this for a handful of infographics and you’ll have a good list of prospects.
Have you ever noticed that when an infographic is embedded on a site, the site owner will usually include the word “infographic” in square brackets in the title tag?
Unfortunately, Google search ignores square brackets (even if they’re in quotes).
But Content Explorer doesn’t.
Content Explorer > search query > “AND [infographic]”
As you can see, you can also use advanced operators in CE to search for multiple terms at once. The search above finds results containing “SEO,” “keyword research,” or “link building” in the title tag, plus “[infographic].”
You can export these easily (with all associated metrics), too.
Let’s assume you’ve found a site that you want a link from.
It’s been manually vetted for relevance… and all looks good.
Here’s how to find a list of similar sites or pages:
This returned ~49 results—all of which were similar sites.
Let’s try our link building guide.
That’s ~45 results, all of which are very similar. 🙂
Here’s one of the results: yoast.com/seo-blog
I’m quite familiar with Yoast, so I know it’s a relevant site/prospect.
But let’s assume that I know nothing about this site, how could I quickly vet this prospect?
- do a
site:domain.comsearch, and note down the number of results;
- do a
site:domain.com [niche]search, then also note down the number of results;
- divide the second number by the first—if it’s above 0.5, it’s a good, relevant prospect; if it’s above 0.75, it’s a super-relevant prospect.
Let’s try this with yoast.com.
Here’s the number of results for a simple
So that’s 3,950 / 3,330 = ~0.84.
(Remember, >0.75 translates to a very relevant prospect, usually)
Now let’s try the same for a site that I know to be irrelevant: greatist.com.
Number of results for
site:greatist.com search: ~18,000
Number of results for
site:greatist.com SEO search: ~7
(18,000 / 7 = ~0.0004 = a totally irrelevant site)
IMPORTANT! This is a great way to quick eliminate highly-irrelevant tactics, but it’s not foolproof—you will sometimes get strange or unenlightening results. I also want to stress that it’s certainly no replacement for manually checking a potential prospect’s website. You should ALWAYS thoroughly check a prospects site before reaching out to them. Failure to do that = SPAMMING.
Site Explorer > relevant domain > Competing Domains
For example, let’s assume I was looking for more SEO-related link prospects.
I could enter ahrefs.com/blog into Site Explorer.
Then check the Competing Domains.
This will reveal domains competing for the same keywords.
Got someone in mind that you want to reach out to?
Try this trick to find their contact details:
Here are the top 4 results:
You can then contact them directly via social media.
Or use some of the tips from steps #4 and #6 in this article to hunt down an email address.
Internal links are important.
They help visitors to find their way around your site.
And they also bring SEO benefits (when used wisely).
But you need to make sure that you’re ONLY adding internal links where relevant.
Let’s say that you just published a big list of SEO tips.
Wouldn’t it be cool to add an internal link to that post from any other posts where you talk about SEO tips?
It’s just that finding relevant places to add such links can be difficult—especially with big sites.
So here’s a quick trick:
For those of you who still haven’t gotten the hang of search operators, here’s what this does:
- Restricts the search to a specific site;
- Excludes the page/post that you want to build internal links to;
- Looks for a certain word or phrase in the text.
Here’s one opportunity I found with this operator:
It took me all of ~3 seconds to find this. 🙂
Here’s a page that mentions a competitor of ours—Moz.
Found using this advanced search:
But why no mention of Ahrefs? 🙁
intext:, I can see that this site has mentioned us a couple of times before.
But they haven’t written any posts dedicated to our toolset, as they have with Moz.
This presents an opportunity.
Reach out, build a relationship, then perhaps they may write about Ahrefs.
Here’s another cool search that can be used to find competitor reviews:
You can build relationships with these people and get them to review your product/service too.
You can also use the “In title” search in Content Explorer to find competitor reviews.
I tried this for Ahrefs and found 795 results.
For clarity, here’s the exact search I used:
review AND (moz OR semrush OR majestic) -site:moz.com -site:semrush.com -site:majestic.com
But you can go even further by highlighting unlinked mentions.
This highlights the sites that have never linked to you before, so you can then prioritise them.
Here’s one site that has never linked to Ahrefs, yet has reviewed our competitor:
You can see that it’s a Domain Rating (DR) 79 website, so it would be well worth getting a mention on this site.
Here’s another cool tip:
daterange: operator is now deprecated. But you can still add a time period filter to find recent competitor mentions.
Just use the inbuilt filter.
Tools > Any time > select time period
Looks like ~34 reviews of our competitors were published in the past month.
Alerts > Mentions > Add alert
Enter the name of your competitor… or any search query you like.
Choose a mode (either “in title” or “everywhere”), add your blocked domains, then add a recipient.
Set your internal to real-time (or whatever interval you prefer).
You will now receive an email whenever your competitors are mentioned online.
Sponsored posts are paid-for posts promoting your brand, product or service.
These are NOT link building opportunities.
Google’s guidelines states the following;
Buying or selling links that pass PageRank. This includes exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links; exchanging goods or services for links; or sending someone a “free” product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link
This is why you should ALWAYS nofollow links in sponsored posts.
But the true value of a sponsored post doesn’t come down to links anyway.
It comes down to PR—i.e., getting your brand in front of the right people.
Here’s one way to find sponsored post opportunities using Google search operators:
~151 results. Not bad.
Here are a few other operator combinations to use:
[niche] intext:”this is a sponsored post by”
[niche] intext:”this post was sponsored by”
[niche] intitle:”sponsored post”
[niche] intitle:”sponsored post archives” inurl:”category/sponsored-post”
“sponsored” AROUND(3) “post”
Forums and Q+A sites are great for promoting content.
One site that comes to mind is Quora.
Quora allow you to drop relevant links throughout your answers.
It’s true that these links are nofollowed.
But we’re not trying to build links here—this is about PR!
Here’s one way to find relevant threads:
Don’t limit yourself to Quora, though.
This can be done with any forum or Q+A site.
Here’s the same search for Warrior Forum:
I also know that Warrior Forum has a search engine optimization category.
Every thread in this category has “.com/search-engine-optimization/” in the URL.
So I could refine my search even further with the inurl: operator.
I’ve found that using search operators like this allows you to search forum threads with more granularity than most on-site searches.
Site Explorer > quora.com > Organic Keywords > search for a niche-relevant keyword
You should now see relevant Quora threads sorted by estimated monthly organic traffic.
Answering such threads can lead to a nice trickle of referral traffic.
Most blogs reside in a subfolder or on a subdomain.
This makes it easy to check how regularly competitors are publishing new content.
Let’s try this for one of our competitors—SEMrush.
Looks like they have ~4.5K blog posts.
But this isn’t accurate. It includes multi-language versions of the blog, which reside on subdomains.
Let’s filter these out.
That’s more like it. ~2.2K blog posts.
Now we know our competitor (SEMrush) has ~2.2K blog posts in total.
Let’s see how many they published in the last month.
daterange: operator no longer works, we’ll instead use Google’s inbuilt filter.
Tools > Any time > select time period
~29 blog posts. Interesting.
FYI, that’s ~4x faster than we publish new posts. And they have ~15X more posts than us in total.
But we still get more traffic… with ~2x the value, might I add 😉
Quality over quantity, right!?
You can also use the
site: operator combined with a search query to see how much content a competitor has published on a certain topic.
Competitors getting links?
What if you could also have them?
link: operator was officially deprecated in 2017.
But I’ve found that it does still return some results.
Google’s data is heavily sampled.
It likely isn’t too accurate either.
Site Explorer can provide a much fuller picture of your competitor’s backlink profile.
~1.5 million backlinks.
That’s a lot more than Google showed us.
This is yet another instance where the time period filter can be useful.
Filtering by the last month, I can see that Moz has gained 18K+ new backlinks.
Pretty useful. But this also illustrates how inaccurate this data can be.
Site Explorer picked up 35K+ links for this same period.
That’s almost DOUBLE!
Google advanced search operators are insanely powerful.
You just have to know how to use them.
But I have to admit that some are more useful than others, especially when it comes to SEO. I find myself using
inurl: on an almost daily basis. Yet I rarely use
allintitle:, and many of the other more obscure operators.
I’d also add that many operators are borderline useless unless paired with another operator… or two, or three.
So do play around with them and let me know what you come up with.
I’d be more than happy to add any useful combinations you discover to the post. 🙂