<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Xibeijia Guan, Author at SEO Blog by Ahrefs</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ahrefs.com/author/xibeijia-guan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/author/xibeijia-guan/</link>
	<description>Link Building Strategies &#38; SEO Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>We Analyzed 137K Sites: 97% of llms.txt Files Never Get Read</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/llmstxt-study/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=198700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Using Ahrefs Web Analytics and Bot Analytics, we analyzed the server logs and live traffic of 137K domains, plus the user agents hitting all of them. Here’s what we found. In late May 2026, Google took both sides of the<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Tracked 1,885 Pages Adding Schema. AI Citations Barely Moved.</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/schema-ai-citations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=196889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AI cited pages were almost three times more likely to have JSON-LD than non-cited pages. That’s a big gap, and the kind of stat that gets shared in LinkedIn carousels and conference slides as proof that schema is an AI<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why ChatGPT Cites One Page Over Another (Study of 1.4M Prompts)</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/why-chatgpt-cites-pages/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=196421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But, although ChatGPT retrieves dozens of URLs to answer a single query, according to our research, it only ends up citing ~50% of them. Why does one page get the credit while another, which the AI clearly retrieved, gets nothing?<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia vs Grokipedia: 5x the Pages, 70x the Citations, 1615x the Traffic</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/wikipedia-vs-grokipedia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=195631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is Grokipedia a serious competitor to Wikipedia, or just a doomed exercise in billionaire hubris? Does Grok bring new value to the table, or just rehash the same old content? Does Grokipedia influence AI search in a similar way to<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: 38% of AI Overview Citations Pull From The Top 10</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overview-citations-top-10/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 10:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=195504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We analyzed 1.9M citations last year in an attempt to answer that question. But, as with everything AI-related, a lot has changed since then. For instance, as of January 2026, AI Overviews are now powered by Gemini 3&#160;to better answer<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: AI Overviews Reduce Clicks by 58%</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overviews-reduce-clicks-update/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 15:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=195053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since then, AI Overviews have rolled out to more countries and more languages, and many websites have continued to see the clicks from organic search decline month-over-month. Today, it seems likely that the impact of AI Overviews has worsened. As<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ChatGPT Gets Googled More Than YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/chatgpt-vs-other-platforms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=194477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That felt impossible. For instance, YouTube has been the internet’s default video platform for nearly two decades. It’s frequently dubbed the second-largest search engine. So I asked Xibeijia, Ahrefs’ superstar data scientist, to pull our data and double-check. Turns out,<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are AI Mode and AI Overviews Just Different Versions of the Same Answer? (730K Responses Studied)</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overviews-vs-ai-mode/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=194087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But after analyzing 730,000 response pairs, we found something unexpected: AI Mode and AI Overviews reach very similar conclusions (86% semantic similarity) while citing different sources (only 13.7% citation overlap). This matters because it suggests these aren’t just a “short<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Brand Visibility Factors in ChatGPT, AI Mode, and AI Overviews (75k Brands Studied)</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-brand-visibility-correlations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=193971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let’s get into it. We studied two new factors in our research this time around: “YouTube mentions” and “YouTube mention impressions”—using newly available data in Ahrefs Brand Radar. Both correlated more strongly with AI visibility than anything else, beating even<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short vs. Long Content in AI Overviews: The Data Says Both Work</title>
		<link>https://ahrefs.com/blog/short-vs-long-content-in-ai-overviews/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xibeijia Guan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data & Studies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ahrefs.com/blog/?p=193644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For instance, this study of only 20 brands (narrow sample size) is proclaiming that content needs 10,000+ words to be cited by AI. I’ve also seen others insist very short content (250–500 words) is the future for visibility in AI,<span class="ellipsis">&#8230;</span><div class="read-more">Read more &#8250;</div><!-- end of .read-more -->]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
